PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPE vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPE vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPE achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 18.32% return.


GXPE

1D
1.15%
1M
-8.52%
YTD
21.27%
6M
22.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPI

1D
1.53%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
18.32%
6M
17.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPE vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPE and MLPI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPE vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPE vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPE vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and MLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPEMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-5.38%

-9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.91%

-3.23%

-10.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-1.49%

-2.09%

Volatility

GXPE vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPEMLPIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.71%

13.04%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

13.04%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

13.04%

+7.67%

GXPE vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPE vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MLPI's 7.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GXPE and MLPI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 0.99% for GXPE.

GXPE is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Global X and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.68% for MLPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPE and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer