TINT vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. TINT is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 10.12%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for CAOS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

TINT vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

TINT

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: 25.24%
• 6M: 25.40%
• 1Y: 44.33%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	25.24%	16.13%	-13.37%	3.68%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.55%	5.33%	7.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and CAOS is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023	0.02

The correlation between TINT and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINT vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINT	CAOS
Basic Materials	22.9%	1.9%
Technology	10.9%	33.1%
Industrials	4.3%	8.5%
Financial Services	3.6%	12.4%
Healthcare	2.2%	9.6%
Communication Services	-	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.4%
Energy	-	4.1%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

TINT vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 54
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 54

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINT	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.24	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	1.98	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	2.49	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	6.22	+2.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINT vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINT	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	1.24	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	1.21	-1.11

Drawdowns

TINT vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-3.60%	-37.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	-0.76%	-16.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	-3.60%	-26.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-1.07%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-0.90%	-20.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	0.30%	+4.53%

Volatility

TINT vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that TINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINT	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	0.26%	+10.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.90%	1.03%	+18.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.75%	1.52%	+22.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.46%	4.26%	+19.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.46%	4.26%	+19.20%

TINT vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	0.98%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and CAOS in my portfolio?

TINT and CAOS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINT or CAOS?

TINT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, TINT or CAOS?

On 3-year performance, TINT leads with 10.12% vs 4.26% for CAOS. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINT or CAOS?

Over the 3-year period, TINT has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or CAOS?

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or CAOS?

TINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between TINT and CAOS?

TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.