PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILGX vs. TSBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILGX achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly higher than TSBIX's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TILGX has outperformed TSBIX with an annualized return of 16.62%, while TSBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


TILGX

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.77%
YTD
6.94%
6M
6.10%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
16.62%

TSBIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.87%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
6.94%15.25%29.23%47.05%-32.76%16.84%44.23%30.76%-0.38%33.89%
TSBIX
TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.46%8.69%3.32%6.05%-14.43%-1.03%7.43%8.94%0.08%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TILGX and TSBIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2012

-0.06

The correlation between TILGX and TSBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILGX vs. TSBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILGX
TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TSBIX
TSBIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TSBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TSBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILGXTSBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.19

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

6.52

-1.40

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the TSBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILGX and TSBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILGXTSBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.62

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.10

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.43

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.56

+0.01

Drawdowns

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILGX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than TSBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILGX and TSBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILGXTSBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.16%

-19.21%

-32.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-2.87%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-6.11%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.86%

-19.21%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.86%

-19.21%

-18.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.54%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-3.56%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

0.96%

+3.54%

Volatility

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) at 1.32%. This indicates that TILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILGXTSBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

1.32%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

2.81%

+8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

3.88%

+11.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

5.83%

+16.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

4.85%

+16.76%

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TSBIX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILGX vs. TSBIX - Dividend Comparison

TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.97%, more than TSBIX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
12.97%13.87%6.41%0.22%0.42%10.49%37.04%4.41%14.12%3.83%1.82%3.80%
TSBIX
TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.73%5.38%5.10%3.77%2.31%1.69%4.56%3.68%2.63%2.45%3.19%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILGX and TSBIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILGX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to TSBIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILGX dropped -52.16% vs TSBIX's -19.21%.

TSBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILGX and TSBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer