TILGX vs. TCSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Conservative Fund (TCSIX).
TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. TCSIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011.
Performance
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -11.95% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
TCSIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Conservative Fund | -3.13% | 12.00% | 8.33% | 12.70% | -13.68% | 6.46% | 12.14% | 15.49% | -4.45% | 10.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILGX achieves a -11.95% return, which is significantly lower than TCSIX's -3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TILGX has outperformed TCSIX with an annualized return of 14.55%, while TCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.68% annualized return.
TILGX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
TCSIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TCSIX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TILGX vs. TCSIX — Risk / Return Rank
TILGX
TCSIX
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Conservative Fund (TCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILGX | TCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.13 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.59 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.31 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 5.78 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILGX | TCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.13 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.52 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.76 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.84 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between TILGX and TCSIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Dividend Comparison
TILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than TCSIX's 5.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.76% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
TCSIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Conservative Fund | 5.09% | 5.59% | 3.28% | 2.96% | 6.28% | 7.32% | 4.75% | 3.57% | 4.36% | 1.77% | 3.57% | 2.56% |
Drawdowns
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILGX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than TCSIX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILGX and TCSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILGX | TCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.16% | -19.12% | -33.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -5.73% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.86% | -19.12% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.86% | -19.12% | -18.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -5.66% | -9.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -2.68% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 1.29% | +3.18% |
Volatility
TILGX vs. TCSIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Conservative Fund (TCSIX) at 2.75%. This indicates that TILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TILGX | TCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 2.75% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 4.45% | +7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.10% | 7.23% | +14.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 7.31% | +14.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 7.45% | +14.11% |