PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSBIX vs. QREARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSBIX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than QREARX's 1.22% return.


TSBIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.46%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
2.05%

QREARX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.29%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSBIX and QREARX is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSBIX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSBIX
TSBIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TSBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSBIXQREARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

2.49

-1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

9.10

-7.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

33.12

-27.54

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSBIX and QREARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.21%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSBIX and QREARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSBIXQREARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-1.45%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-0.37%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

0.00%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-0.06%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.10%

+0.91%

Volatility

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.23%. This indicates that TSBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSBIXQREARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.23%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

0.49%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

0.79%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

1.64%

+4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

1.64%

+3.21%

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSBIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSBIX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

TSBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSBIX
TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.73%5.38%5.10%3.77%2.31%1.69%4.56%3.68%2.63%2.45%3.19%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSBIX and QREARX have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSBIX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to QREARX (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSBIX dropped -19.21% vs QREARX's -1.45%.

QREARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSBIX and QREARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer