TIIV vs. TMED
TIIV (AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF) and TMED (T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIIV is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by AAM, while TMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TIIV returned 25.15% vs 42.30% for TMED. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TIIV charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TMED.
Performance
TIIV vs. TMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than TMED's 16.91% return.
TIIV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.71%
TMED
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 16.95%
- YTD
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 42.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.60K | $14.86K | $76.21K | |
| $576.43K | $346.09K | $158.73K |
TIIV vs. TMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF | 11.86% | 10.83% |
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | 16.91% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIIV and TMED is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIIV vs. TMED — Risk / Return Rank
TIIV
TMED
TIIV vs. TMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIIV | TMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.83 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 13.07 | -3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIIV vs. TMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum TMED drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and TMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIIV | TMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -11.11% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -11.11% | +1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.80% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -2.41% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.25% | -0.47% |
Volatility
TIIV vs. TMED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) is 3.16%, while T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that TIIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIIV | TMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 4.97% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 14.01% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 18.35% | -4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 18.11% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 18.11% | -3.73% |
TIIV vs. TMED - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TMED's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIIV vs. TMED - Dividend Comparison
TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than TMED's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF | 3.18% | 2.33% |
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | 0.47% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIIV and TMED have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMED has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to TIIV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIIV dropped -9.68% vs TMED's -11.11%.
On 1-year performance, TMED leads with 42.30% vs 25.15% for TIIV. On fees, TMED is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TIIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMED has performed better with a 42.30% return vs 25.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMED is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.
TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.47% for TMED.
TIIV is categorized as Actively Managed, while TMED is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: AAM and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.44% for TMED.
TMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIIV and TMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer