PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIIV vs. SAWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIIV vs. SAWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than SAWG's 9.76% return.


TIIV

1D
0.61%
1M
3.12%
6M
8.82%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SAWG

1D
1.17%
1M
3.17%
6M
9.30%
YTD
9.76%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIIV vs. SAWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIIV and SAWG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIIV vs. SAWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SAWG
SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIIV vs. SAWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIIVSAWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

TIIV vs. SAWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIIV vs. SAWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum SAWG drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and SAWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIIVSAWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-18.68%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-2.61%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

Volatility

TIIV vs. SAWG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIIVSAWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

12.93%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

16.17%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

16.17%

-1.56%

TIIV vs. SAWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SAWG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIIV vs. SAWG - Dividend Comparison

TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SAWG's 0.25% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIIV and SAWG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SAWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.25% for SAWG.

TIIV is categorized as Actively Managed, while SAWG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.49% for SAWG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIIV and SAWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer