TIHGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
TIHGX is managed by Investment House Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2001. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund | -11.34% | 10.35% | 31.44% | 49.94% | -37.04% | 21.26% | 39.61% | 32.82% | -4.47% | -0.82% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIHGX achieves a -11.34% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -9.81% return.
TIHGX
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -11.34%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIHGX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIHGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
TIHGX
SWLGX
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIHGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.83 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.35 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.17 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 4.02 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIHGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.83 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIHGX and SWLGX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
TIHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.48% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIHGX drawdown since its inception was -57.34%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIHGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIHGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.34% | -32.69% | -24.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.95% | -16.16% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.66% | -32.69% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | -13.03% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -7.13% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 4.69% | +0.18% |
Volatility
TIHGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) is 6.37%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that TIHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIHGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 6.73% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 12.40% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 22.57% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 21.52% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 22.81% | -0.82% |