PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIHGX vs. BPTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIHGX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than BPTRX's -1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TIHGX has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 15.34%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.95% annualized return.


TIHGX

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.79%
YTD
1.42%
6M
0.71%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
15.34%

BPTRX

1D
-0.98%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
18.45%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
23.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIHGX
The Investment House Growth Fund
1.42%10.35%31.44%49.94%-37.04%21.26%39.61%32.82%-4.47%34.06%
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
-1.17%24.54%32.75%43.09%-42.53%31.35%148.81%44.99%-2.01%31.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TIHGX and BPTRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2002

0.75

The correlation between TIHGX and BPTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIHGX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIHGX
TIHGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TIHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TIHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BPTRX
BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIHGXBPTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.27

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

2.86

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

6.97

-5.23

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIHGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the BPTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIHGX and BPTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIHGXBPTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.11

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.55

-0.07

Drawdowns

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIHGX drawdown since its inception was -57.34%, smaller than the maximum BPTRX drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIHGX and BPTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIHGXBPTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.34%

-64.11%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.95%

-10.71%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-33.34%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.66%

-49.87%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-51.26%

+10.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-4.57%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-13.78%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

4.42%

+0.65%

Volatility

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison

The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIHGXBPTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.59%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

21.25%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

27.59%

-12.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

33.61%

-11.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.02%

32.69%

-10.67%

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIHGX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIHGX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison

TIHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BPTRX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
3.40%3.36%0.76%0.00%3.19%7.72%3.67%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%
TIHGX
The Investment House Growth Fund
0.03%0.03%0.00%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIHGX and BPTRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIHGX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BPTRX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIHGX dropped -57.34% vs BPTRX's -64.11%.

BPTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIHGX and BPTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer