TIHGX vs. CLOI
TIHGX (The Investment House Growth Fund) and CLOI (VanEck CLO ETF) are both funds - TIHGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Investment House Funds, while CLOI is a CLO fund actively managed by VanEck. Over the past 3 years, TIHGX returned 20.06%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for CLOI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIHGX charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CLOI.
Performance
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIHGX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than CLOI's 2.06% return.
TIHGX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 8.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
CLOI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund | 1.42% | 10.35% | 31.44% | 49.94% | -7.15% |
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF | 2.06% | 5.84% | 8.26% | 8.95% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIHGX and CLOI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIHGX vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank
TIHGX
CLOI
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIHGX | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 2.14 | -1.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 8.79 | -8.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | 41.57 | -39.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIHGX | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 4.64 | -4.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 2.76 | -2.29 |
Drawdowns
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIHGX drawdown since its inception was -57.34%, which is greater than CLOI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIHGX and CLOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIHGX | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.34% | -3.25% | -54.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.95% | -0.62% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -3.25% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | 0.00% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -0.19% | -9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.07% | 0.13% | +4.94% |
Volatility
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison
The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.14%. This indicates that TIHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIHGX | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 0.14% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 0.67% | +10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 1.18% | +13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 2.55% | +19.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 2.55% | +19.47% |
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIHGX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIHGX vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison
TIHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than CLOI's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF | 5.35% | 5.61% | 6.71% | 5.61% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIHGX and CLOI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIHGX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to CLOI (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIHGX dropped -57.34% vs CLOI's -3.25%.
CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIHGX and CLOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer