TIHGX vs. CLOI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI).

TIHGX is managed by Investment House Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2001. CLOI is an actively managed fund by VanEck. It was launched on Jun 21, 2022.

Performance

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund	-11.34%	10.35%	31.44%	49.94%	-7.15%
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	0.62%	5.84%	8.26%	8.95%	2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIHGX achieves a -11.34% return, which is significantly lower than CLOI's 0.62% return.

TIHGX

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: -11.34%
• 6M: -9.62%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 18.02%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 13.80%

CLOI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 7.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIHGX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOI's 0.40% expense ratio.

TIHGX

The Investment House Growth Fund

CLOI

VanEck CLO ETF

Return for Risk

TIHGX vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIHGX

TIHGX Risk / Return Rank: 9
TIHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TIHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TIHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
TIHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TIHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CLOI

CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 73
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIHGX	CLOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	1.17	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	1.47	-0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.43	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	1.66	-1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	12.89	-11.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIHGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the CLOI Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIHGX and CLOI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIHGX	CLOI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	1.17	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.68	-2.23

Correlation

The correlation between TIHGX and CLOI is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison

TIHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than CLOI's 5.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund	0.04%	0.03%	0.00%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.48%
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	5.48%	5.61%	6.71%	5.61%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIHGX drawdown since its inception was -57.34%, which is greater than CLOI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIHGX and CLOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIHGX	CLOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.34%	-3.25%	-54.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.95%	-3.00%	-13.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.78%	-0.13%	-13.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.65%	-0.19%	-9.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.87%	0.42%	+4.45%

Volatility

TIHGX vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison

The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.44%. This indicates that TIHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIHGX	CLOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	0.44%	+5.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	0.74%	+11.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.85%	4.16%	+17.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.54%	2.61%	+19.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	2.61%	+19.38%