TIGGX vs. PAGRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TIGGX (Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio) and PAGRX (Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TIGGX returned 11.88%/yr vs 20.66%/yr for PAGRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TIGGX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for PAGRX.

Performance

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGGX achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than PAGRX's 15.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TIGGX has underperformed PAGRX with an annualized return of 11.88%, while PAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.66% annualized return.

TIGGX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 9.92%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 25.17%
• 3Y*: 19.97%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 11.88%

PAGRX

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 8.09%
• YTD: 15.32%
• 6M: 17.99%
• 1Y: 42.01%
• 3Y*: 40.55%
• 5Y*: 19.57%
• 10Y*: 20.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TIGGX Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio	9.92%	19.03%	19.85%	20.23%	-15.36%	22.25%	12.24%	21.51%	-9.63%	19.15%
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio	15.32%	36.92%	44.52%	38.73%	-26.06%	24.84%	37.65%	40.34%	-12.41%	21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGGX and PAGRX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2008	0.89

The correlation between TIGGX and PAGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TIGGX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGGX

TIGGX Risk / Return Rank: 61
TIGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TIGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TIGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TIGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TIGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PAGRX

PAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIGGX	PAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.47	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.29	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	4.63	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	19.75	-6.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the PAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGGX and PAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIGGX	PAGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.47	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.80	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.85	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.54	-0.05

Drawdowns

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGGX drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGGX and PAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIGGX	PAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-55.87%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-9.14%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.10%	-26.34%	+10.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.71%	-36.52%	+14.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.91%	-38.01%	+5.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.86%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-10.05%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.14%	-0.17%

Volatility

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) is 3.24%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that TIGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIGGX	PAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	4.75%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	12.95%	-4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	17.18%	-5.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	24.45%	-10.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	24.51%	-9.29%

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIGGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIGGX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison

TIGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio	0.03%	0.03%	5.62%	2.72%	7.79%	6.82%	15.08%	17.51%	12.33%	8.70%	16.94%	6.31%
TIGGX Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio	4.86%	5.34%	2.90%	1.31%	3.61%	1.78%	1.15%	1.65%	0.81%	1.34%	1.12%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIGGX and PAGRX in my portfolio?

TIGGX and PAGRX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIGGX or PAGRX?

PAGRX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to TIGGX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGGX dropped -50.68% vs PAGRX's -55.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.