TIGGX vs. FEQHX
TIGGX (Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio) and FEQHX (Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, TIGGX returned 20.25%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for FEQHX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TIGGX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FEQHX.
Performance
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIGGX achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than FEQHX's 10.01% return.
TIGGX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
FEQHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIGGX Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio | 10.69% | 19.03% | 19.85% | 20.23% | -1.57% |
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 10.01% | 13.61% | 19.46% | 17.65% | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIGGX and FEQHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TIGGX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIGGX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank
TIGGX
FEQHX
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIGGX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 2.52 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.37 | 3.55 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.11 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 12.42 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIGGX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.52 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.32 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIGGX drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGGX and FEQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIGGX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -10.42% | -40.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -7.40% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.10% | -10.42% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -2.22% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.85% | +0.12% |
Volatility
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 2.68%. This indicates that TIGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIGGX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.68% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 6.63% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 9.15% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 11.24% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 11.24% | +3.98% |
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIGGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIGGX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison
TIGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 0.51% | 0.43% | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIGGX Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio | 4.82% | 5.34% | 2.90% | 1.31% | 3.61% | 1.78% | 1.15% | 1.65% | 0.81% | 1.34% | 1.12% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TIGGX and FEQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TIGGX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to FEQHX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGGX dropped -50.68% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.
FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIGGX and FEQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer