PortfoliosLab logo
TIGGX vs. FLCNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TIGGX and FLCNX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TIGGX:

0.65

FLCNX:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

TIGGX:

0.95

FLCNX:

1.20

Omega Ratio

TIGGX:

1.14

FLCNX:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

TIGGX:

0.63

FLCNX:

0.86

Martin Ratio

TIGGX:

2.56

FLCNX:

2.94

Ulcer Index

TIGGX:

3.99%

FLCNX:

5.93%

Daily Std Dev

TIGGX:

17.04%

FLCNX:

22.67%

Max Drawdown

TIGGX:

-49.81%

FLCNX:

-32.07%

Current Drawdown

TIGGX:

-1.44%

FLCNX:

-2.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGGX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than FLCNX's 5.17% return.


TIGGX

YTD

3.34%

1M

5.73%

6M

1.79%

1Y

10.99%

3Y*

11.68%

5Y*

13.06%

10Y*

8.54%

FLCNX

YTD

5.17%

1M

8.83%

6M

4.47%

1Y

17.59%

3Y*

21.61%

5Y*

17.29%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Contrafund K6

TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIGGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TIGGX vs. FLCNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIGGX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIGGX is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIGGX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIGGX is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIGGX is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIGGX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCNX is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TIGGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the FLCNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGGX and FLCNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison

TIGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than FLCNX's 0.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TIGGX
Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio
2.00%2.07%1.31%3.61%1.78%1.15%1.43%0.81%1.34%1.12%2.53%3.27%
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
0.41%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGGX drawdown since its inception was -49.81%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGGX and FLCNX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) is 4.00%, while Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that TIGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...