TIGGX vs. FLCNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX).
TIGGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008. FLCNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017.
Performance
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIGGX Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio | -1.30% | 19.03% | 19.85% | 20.23% | -15.36% | 22.25% | 12.24% | 21.51% | -9.63% | 9.87% |
FLCNX Fidelity Contrafund K6 | -4.95% | 22.05% | 35.37% | 37.67% | -27.13% | 24.21% | 30.85% | 30.91% | -2.16% | 13.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIGGX achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly higher than FLCNX's -4.95% return.
TIGGX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
FLCNX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIGGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIGGX vs. FLCNX — Risk / Return Rank
TIGGX
FLCNX
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIGGX | FLCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.02 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.57 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.85 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 6.96 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIGGX | FLCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.02 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.71 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.79 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIGGX and FLCNX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison
TIGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than FLCNX's 12.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIGGX Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio | 5.41% | 5.34% | 2.90% | 1.31% | 3.61% | 1.78% | 1.15% | 1.65% | 0.81% | 1.34% | 1.12% | 1.78% |
FLCNX Fidelity Contrafund K6 | 12.08% | 8.35% | 0.36% | 0.49% | 1.18% | 0.46% | 0.21% | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIGGX drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGGX and FLCNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIGGX | FLCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -32.07% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -11.73% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | -32.07% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -7.82% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -6.76% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 3.12% | -0.62% |
Volatility
TIGGX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) is 5.34%, while Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that TIGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIGGX | FLCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 6.72% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 11.42% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 20.47% | -5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 19.09% | -4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 20.52% | -5.33% |