PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIGGX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGGX achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than GSINX's 6.39% return.


TIGGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.69%
6M
11.51%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
11.96%

GSINX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIGGX
Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio
10.69%19.03%19.85%20.23%-15.36%22.25%12.24%21.51%-9.63%18.17%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.39%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGGX and GSINX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between TIGGX and GSINX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIGGX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGGX
TIGGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TIGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIGGXGSINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.25

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

1.76

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.55

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.98

5.17

+8.81

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGGX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIGGXGSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.25

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.63

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.81

-0.31

Drawdowns

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGGX drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGGX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIGGXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-28.80%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-7.80%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-10.32%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.71%

-25.46%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.72%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-4.85%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.33%

-0.36%

Volatility

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio (TIGGX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 2.75%. This indicates that TIGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIGGXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.75%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

7.89%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

9.68%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

14.37%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

15.69%

-0.47%

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIGGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIGGX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

TIGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than GSINX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%
TIGGX
Goldman Sachs Tax-Advantaged Global Equity Portfolio
4.82%5.34%2.90%1.31%3.61%1.78%1.15%1.65%0.81%1.34%1.12%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIGGX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIGGX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to GSINX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGGX dropped -50.68% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

TIGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIGGX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer