PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIER vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIER vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 19.10% return.


TIER

1D
0.13%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.39%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.22%
6M
16.45%
YTD
19.10%
1Y
32.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIER vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIER and IFLO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.83

The correlation between TIER and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TIER vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TIER
IFLO

Technology

23.7%
21.5%

Financial Services

23.6%
1.1%

Industrials

13.7%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
13.8%

Basic Materials

7.3%
11.3%

Healthcare

5.9%
11.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
6.7%

Energy

5.1%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.8%

Utilities

2.5%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.0%

Technology

TIER
23.7%
IFLO
21.5%

Financial Services

TIER
23.6%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

TIER
13.7%
IFLO
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TIER
7.4%
IFLO
13.8%

Basic Materials

TIER
7.3%
IFLO
11.3%

Healthcare

TIER
5.9%
IFLO
11.7%

Communication Services

TIER
5.2%
IFLO
6.7%

Energy

TIER
5.1%
IFLO
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

TIER
4.6%
IFLO
2.8%

Utilities

TIER
2.5%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

TIER
1.1%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIER vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIER
TIER Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TIER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIER Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIER Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TIER Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIER Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIER vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIERIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

4.95

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

16.66

-7.94

TIER vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIER Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIER and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIER vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIERIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.07%

-6.44%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-6.44%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-1.58%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-1.28%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.91%

+1.20%

Volatility

TIER vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 5.00%. This indicates that TIER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIERIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

5.00%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

12.03%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

14.67%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

14.62%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

14.62%

+1.81%

TIER vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIER vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than IFLO's 1.56% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIER and IFLO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIER has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to IFLO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIER dropped -12.07% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.35% vs 28.04% for TIER. On fees, TIER is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.35% return vs 28.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIER is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.65% for TIER.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIER and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer