TIBAX vs. GLFOX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TIBAX (Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund) and GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) are both mutual funds - TIBAX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Thornburg, while GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, TIBAX returned 12.62%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for GLFOX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIBAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for GLFOX.

Performance

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBAX achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than GLFOX's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBAX has outperformed GLFOX with an annualized return of 12.62%, while GLFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.

TIBAX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 16.64%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 35.15%
• 3Y*: 25.73%
• 5Y*: 15.96%
• 10Y*: 12.62%

GLFOX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 16.48%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund	16.64%	36.62%	13.23%	18.01%	-7.95%	20.08%	-0.67%	17.72%	-4.54%	14.83%
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	8.78%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBAX and GLFOX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TIBAX and GLFOX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TIBAX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBAX

TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 98
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 31
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TIBAX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.12	1.53	+2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.84	2.06	+3.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.28	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.67	1.84	+4.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.46	5.72	+19.74

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is higher than the GLFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBAX and GLFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBAX drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, which is greater than GLFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBAX and GLFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIBAX	GLFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.12%	-29.65%	-19.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.43%	-9.01%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.20%	-10.07%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.94%	-17.14%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	-29.65%	-5.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-4.52%	+3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-3.42%	-2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	2.89%	-1.47%

Volatility

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) at 2.61%. This indicates that TIBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIBAX	GLFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.61%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.36%	9.39%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.78%	10.84%	-2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.15%	11.01%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	13.24%	+0.18%

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIBAX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison

TIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than GLFOX's 7.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.01%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund	4.97%	5.64%	5.44%	4.67%	5.62%	5.10%	4.11%	4.23%	4.49%	4.22%	3.83%	4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIBAX and GLFOX in my portfolio?

TIBAX and GLFOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIBAX or GLFOX?

TIBAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to GLFOX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBAX dropped -49.12% vs GLFOX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.