PortfoliosLab logo
TIBAX vs. HFQAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TIBAX and HFQAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TIBAX:

1.47

HFQAX:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

TIBAX:

2.07

HFQAX:

1.34

Omega Ratio

TIBAX:

1.32

HFQAX:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

TIBAX:

1.91

HFQAX:

1.05

Martin Ratio

TIBAX:

7.27

HFQAX:

4.36

Ulcer Index

TIBAX:

2.41%

HFQAX:

2.93%

Daily Std Dev

TIBAX:

11.45%

HFQAX:

12.91%

Max Drawdown

TIBAX:

-46.73%

HFQAX:

-48.93%

Current Drawdown

TIBAX:

0.00%

HFQAX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBAX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than HFQAX's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBAX has outperformed HFQAX with an annualized return of 7.50%, while HFQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.


TIBAX

YTD

12.91%

1M

6.62%

6M

14.25%

1Y

16.63%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

7.50%

HFQAX

YTD

12.24%

1M

5.54%

6M

11.75%

1Y

11.38%

5Y*

11.88%

10Y*

5.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TIBAX vs. HFQAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIBAX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIBAX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HFQAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HFQAX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HFQAX is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the HFQAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBAX and HFQAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison

TIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than HFQAX's 7.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.08%4.57%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%5.20%
HFQAX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund
7.20%7.96%7.89%8.02%6.92%7.25%6.80%7.66%6.03%6.77%6.62%6.20%

Drawdowns

TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBAX drawdown since its inception was -46.73%, roughly equal to the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -48.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBAX and HFQAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) is 2.32%, while Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that TIBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...