TIBAX vs. HFQAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX).
TIBAX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 23, 2002. HFQAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Nov 29, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TIBAX or HFQAX.
Key characteristics
| TIBAX | HFQAX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.79% | 6.97% |
| 1Y Return | 18.68% | 13.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.40% | 4.11% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.02% | 5.58% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.69% | 4.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.39 | 1.51 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.35 | 2.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.10 | 2.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.34 | 9.02 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.30% | 1.75% |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.37% | 10.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.73% | -48.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.68% | -5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBAX and HFQAX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TIBAX achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than HFQAX's 6.97% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBAX has outperformed HFQAX with an annualized return of 6.69%, while HFQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQAX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Dividend Comparison
TIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than HFQAX's 7.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 4.42% | 4.67% | 5.62% | 5.10% | 4.11% | 4.23% | 4.49% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.31% | 5.20% | 4.61% |
HFQAX Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund | 7.84% | 7.90% | 8.03% | 6.93% | 7.27% | 6.81% | 7.67% | 6.04% | 6.77% | 6.62% | 6.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBAX drawdown since its inception was -46.73%, roughly equal to the maximum HFQAX drawdown of -48.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBAX and HFQAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TIBAX vs. HFQAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) is 2.06%, while Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund (HFQAX) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that TIBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.