PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIBAX vs. PGEOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and George Putnam Balanced Fund (PGEOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBAX achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than PGEOX's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBAX has outperformed PGEOX with an annualized return of 12.35%, while PGEOX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.


TIBAX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.18%
6M
20.85%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
26.26%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
12.35%

PGEOX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.81%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.64%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
17.18%36.62%13.23%18.01%-7.95%20.08%-0.67%17.72%-4.54%14.83%
PGEOX
George Putnam Balanced Fund
8.59%14.02%20.65%19.93%-17.59%13.80%9.25%22.61%-3.03%15.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TIBAX and PGEOX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2002

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between TIBAX and PGEOX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIBAX vs. PGEOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBAX
TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

PGEOX
PGEOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PGEOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGEOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGEOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PGEOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGEOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) and George Putnam Balanced Fund (PGEOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIBAXPGEOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.75

2.83

+1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.81

4.01

+2.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.54

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.37

3.99

+3.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.83

18.89

+9.94

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIBAX Sharpe Ratio is 4.75, which is higher than the PGEOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBAX and PGEOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIBAXPGEOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75

2.83

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

0.85

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.88

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.44

+0.35

Drawdowns

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBAX drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, roughly equal to the maximum PGEOX drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBAX and PGEOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIBAXPGEOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.12%

-50.63%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-5.72%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-12.61%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-21.36%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-23.00%

-11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-11.74%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.21%

+0.18%

Volatility

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to George Putnam Balanced Fund (PGEOX) at 2.33%. This indicates that TIBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGEOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIBAXPGEOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.33%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

6.38%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.42%

8.11%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

11.41%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.46%

11.62%

+1.84%

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than PGEOX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIBAX vs. PGEOX - Dividend Comparison

TIBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than PGEOX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGEOX
George Putnam Balanced Fund
7.55%8.13%7.99%1.10%0.89%7.75%1.05%5.22%9.04%1.10%1.18%1.13%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
4.88%5.64%5.44%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIBAX and PGEOX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to PGEOX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIBAX dropped -49.12% vs PGEOX's -50.63%.

TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.75 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIBAX and PGEOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer