THTA vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - THTA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by SoFi, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). THTA is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, THTA returned 16.62% vs 118.05% for UCO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. THTA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

THTA vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THTA achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 142.55% return.

THTA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 142.55%
• 6M: 133.13%
• 1Y: 118.05%
• 3Y*: 24.78%
• 5Y*: 21.76%
• 10Y*: -11.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THTA vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	6.88%	-10.24%	7.31%	1.04%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	142.55%	-29.75%	5.36%	-12.21%

Correlation

The correlation between THTA and UCO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	-0.03

The correlation between THTA and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

THTA vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THTA

THTA Risk / Return Rank: 92
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 95
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 56
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THTA vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THTA	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.08	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.25	2.43	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.32	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	3.78	+2.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	51.29	7.17	+44.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THTA vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THTA and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THTA	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.08	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	-0.34	+0.42

Drawdowns

THTA vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THTA drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THTA and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	THTA	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.41%	-99.95%	+68.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-34.77%	+32.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	-99.25%	+92.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-85.48%	+77.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	18.32%	-18.00%

Volatility

THTA vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) is 0.75%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 22.10%. This indicates that THTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THTA	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	22.10%	-21.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.00%	46.40%	-42.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.80%	57.35%	-51.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.27%	59.77%	-39.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.27%	71.36%	-51.09%

THTA vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

THTA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

THTA vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

THTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	11.26%	12.66%	12.44%	0.58%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THTA and UCO in my portfolio?

THTA and UCO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THTA or UCO?

UCO has higher volatility (22.10%) compared to THTA (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THTA dropped -31.41% vs UCO's -99.95%.

Which ETF is better, THTA or UCO?

On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 118.05% vs 16.62% for THTA. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THTA or UCO?

Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 118.05% return vs 16.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THTA or UCO?

THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THTA or UCO?

THTA has the higher dividend yield at 11.26%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between THTA and UCO?

THTA is categorized as Derivative Income, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for THTA and 0.95% for UCO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.