THRY vs. AEM
THRY (Thryv Holdings, Inc.) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. THRY operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, THRY returned -37.25%/yr vs 24.66%/yr for AEM. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
THRY vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRY achieves a -44.30% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's -1.16% return.
THRY
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -44.30%
- 6M
- -43.55%
- 1Y
- -73.17%
- 3Y*
- -48.25%
- 5Y*
- -37.25%
- 10Y*
- —
AEM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -6.98%
- 1Y
- 39.16%
- 3Y*
- 53.19%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
THRY vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRY Thryv Holdings, Inc. | -44.30% | -59.12% | -27.27% | 7.11% | -53.81% | 204.67% | -3.57% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -1.16% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | -10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRY and AEM is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.07 |
The correlation between THRY and AEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
THRY:
$152.48M
AEM:
$83.71B
THRY:
$0.33
AEM:
$10.60
THRY:
10.34
AEM:
15.75
THRY:
0.27
AEM:
0.25
THRY:
0.19
AEM:
6.22
THRY:
0.68
AEM:
3.19
THRY:
$771.33M
AEM:
$13.51B
THRY:
$522.68M
AEM:
$8.28B
THRY:
$81.86M
AEM:
$9.72B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRY vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
THRY
AEM
THRY vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THRY | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.18 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 1.00 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 2.69 | -4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THRY vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRY drawdown since its inception was -94.96%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRY and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRY | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.96% | -90.49% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.84% | -39.39% | -45.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.69% | -39.39% | -52.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.96% | -41.97% | -52.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.92% | -33.68% | -58.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -46.64% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.42% | 14.62% | +40.80% |
Volatility
THRY vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 15.34%. This indicates that THRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRY | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.49% | 15.34% | +4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.34% | 36.50% | +44.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.81% | 44.59% | +40.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.55% | 37.08% | +17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.26% | 37.41% | +23.85% |
Dividends
THRY vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
THRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.02% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
THRY Thryv Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
THRY vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thryv Holdings, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
THRY vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
THRY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thryv Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.26M and revenue of 167.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
THRY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thryv Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.06M and revenue of 167.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
THRY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thryv Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.54M and revenue of 167.68M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
THRY and AEM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THRY has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to AEM (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRY dropped -94.96% vs AEM's -90.49%.
AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THRY and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer