THRY vs. AAMI
THRY (Thryv Holdings, Inc.) and AAMI (Acadian Asset Management Inc) are both stocks. THRY operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while AAMI operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, THRY returned -37.25%/yr vs 25.65%/yr for AAMI. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
THRY vs. AAMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRY achieves a -44.30% return, which is significantly lower than AAMI's 57.73% return.
THRY
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -44.30%
- 6M
- -43.55%
- 1Y
- -73.17%
- 3Y*
- -48.25%
- 5Y*
- -37.25%
- 10Y*
- —
AAMI
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 57.73%
- 6M
- 53.99%
- 1Y
- 134.32%
- 3Y*
- 54.11%
- 5Y*
- 25.65%
- 10Y*
- —
THRY vs. AAMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRY Thryv Holdings, Inc. | -44.30% | -59.12% | -27.27% | 7.11% | -53.81% | 204.67% | -3.57% |
AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc | 57.73% | 78.64% | 37.70% | -6.72% | -19.45% | 33.00% | 49.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRY and AAMI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
THRY:
$152.48M
AAMI:
$2.65B
THRY:
$0.33
AAMI:
$2.35
THRY:
10.34
AAMI:
31.44
THRY:
0.19
AAMI:
4.13
THRY:
0.68
AAMI:
34.13
THRY:
$771.33M
AAMI:
$641.50M
THRY:
$522.68M
AAMI:
$652.90M
THRY:
$81.86M
AAMI:
$185.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRY vs. AAMI — Risk / Return Rank
THRY
AAMI
THRY vs. AAMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) and Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THRY | AAMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.50 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 7.42 | -8.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 19.97 | -21.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THRY vs. AAMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRY drawdown since its inception was -94.96%, which is greater than AAMI's maximum drawdown of -75.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRY and AAMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRY | AAMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.96% | -75.23% | -19.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.84% | -18.20% | -66.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.69% | -29.63% | -62.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.96% | -51.45% | -43.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.92% | -10.67% | -81.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -20.58% | -27.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.42% | 6.75% | +48.67% |
Volatility
THRY vs. AAMI - Volatility Comparison
Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) at 14.57%. This indicates that THRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRY | AAMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.49% | 14.57% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.34% | 28.41% | +52.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.81% | 41.21% | +43.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.55% | 34.88% | +19.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.26% | 42.19% | +19.07% |
Dividends
THRY vs. AAMI - Dividend Comparison
THRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc | 0.30% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 1.19% | 3.91% | 2.81% |
THRY Thryv Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
THRY vs. AAMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thryv Holdings, Inc. and Acadian Asset Management Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
THRY vs. AAMI - Profitability Comparison
THRY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thryv Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.26M and revenue of 167.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.
AAMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 159.30M and revenue of 167.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
THRY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thryv Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.06M and revenue of 167.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
AAMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 42.00M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
THRY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thryv Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.54M and revenue of 167.68M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
AAMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 24.30M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
THRY and AAMI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THRY has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to AAMI (14.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRY dropped -94.96% vs AAMI's -75.23%.
AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THRY and AAMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer