PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THRV vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THRV vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prospera Income ETF (THRV) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THRV achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 8.42% return.


THRV

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTAP

1D
-1.08%
1M
-12.31%
YTD
8.42%
6M
7.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THRV vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between THRV and CTAP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THRV vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prospera Income ETF (THRV) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

THRV vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THRV vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THRV drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRV and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THRVCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-15.19%

+13.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-15.07%

+14.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-2.99%

+2.55%

Volatility

THRV vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THRVCTAPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

24.37%

-21.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

24.37%

-21.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

24.37%

-21.41%

THRV vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

THRV has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

THRV vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

THRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than CTAP's 0.73% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


THRV and CTAP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 0.73% for CTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Prospera Funds and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.80% for THRV and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THRV and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer