THRO vs. VGT
THRO (iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THRO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by iShares, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. THRO is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, THRO returned 24.41%/yr vs 33.48%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THRO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
THRO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRO achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
THRO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
THRO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 12.78% | 15.04% | 32.03% | 24.40% | -17.85% | 2.14% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRO and VGT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between THRO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
THRO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THRO
VGT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
THRO
VGT
Financial Services
THRO
VGT
Communication Services
THRO
VGT
Industrials
THRO
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
THRO
VGT
Consumer Defensive
THRO
VGT
-
Healthcare
THRO
VGT
Energy
THRO
VGT
Basic Materials
THRO
VGT
Utilities
THRO
VGT
-
Real Estate
THRO
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
THRO
VGT
THRO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THRO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.69 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 11.77 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THRO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.95 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.68 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
THRO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -54.63% | +28.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -16.40% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -27.23% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -1.48% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -7.95% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 5.13% | -2.68% |
Volatility
THRO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is 3.47%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that THRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 6.39% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 16.07% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 20.57% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 25.18% | -6.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 24.60% | -5.88% |
THRO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
THRO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
THRO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THRO and VGT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to THRO (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRO dropped -26.54% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 24.41% for THRO. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, THRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 24.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for THRO.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.16% for THRO.
THRO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for THRO and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THRO and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer