THRM vs. CSL
THRM (Gentherm Incorporated) and CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) are both stocks. THRM operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CSL operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, THRM returned 2.53%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for CSL. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
THRM vs. CSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRM achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, THRM has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of 2.53%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
THRM
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 19.78%
- 6M
- 26.97%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- -14.99%
- 5Y*
- -13.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.04%
CSL
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.98M | $195.31M | $163.99M | |
| $30.60M | $20.21M | $14.43M |
THRM vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRM Gentherm Incorporated | 11.58% | -8.90% | -23.75% | -19.80% | -24.87% | 33.24% | 46.92% | 11.03% | 25.92% | -6.20% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 13.20% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRM and CSL is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1993 | 0.27 |
The correlation between THRM and CSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
THRM:
$1.24B
CSL:
$14.56B
THRM:
$0.86
CSL:
$17.39
THRM:
47.15
CSL:
20.69
THRM:
1.00
CSL:
2.94
THRM:
1.74
CSL:
9.08
THRM:
$1.26B
CSL:
$5.10B
THRM:
$369.10M
CSL:
$865.80M
THRM:
$100.08M
CSL:
$1.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRM vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank
THRM
CSL
THRM vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THRM | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.11 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 0.18 | +1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THRM vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRM drawdown since its inception was -99.08%, which is greater than CSL's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRM and CSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRM | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.08% | -64.56% | -34.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.32% | -25.48% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.00% | -37.72% | -26.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.34% | -37.72% | -38.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.34% | -38.68% | -37.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.84% | -23.66% | -35.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.30% | -12.36% | -48.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.89% | 15.31% | -1.42% |
Volatility
THRM vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison
Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) has a higher volatility of 26.33% compared to Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) at 15.99%. This indicates that THRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRM | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.33% | 15.99% | +10.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.20% | 30.09% | +7.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.55% | 39.89% | +5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 31.93% | +10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.17% | 30.23% | +8.94% |
Dividends
THRM vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison
THRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
THRM Gentherm Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
THRM vs. CSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gentherm Incorporated and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
THRM vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison
THRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gentherm Incorporated reported a gross profit of 96.43M and revenue of 96.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of -363.20M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.1%.
THRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gentherm Incorporated reported an operating income of 10.69M and revenue of 96.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 352.50M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
THRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gentherm Incorporated reported a net income of 4.42M and revenue of 96.43M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 255.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
THRM and CSL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THRM has higher volatility (26.33%) compared to CSL (15.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRM dropped -99.08% vs CSL's -64.56%.
THRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THRM and CSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer