PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. MUSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly higher than MUSQ's -12.75% return.


THNQ

1D
1.65%
1M
-4.13%
6M
31.35%
YTD
33.15%
1Y
55.63%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.75%

MUSQ

1D
-4.84%
1M
-4.32%
6M
-11.21%
YTD
-12.75%
1Y
-8.84%
3Y*
-0.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$161.63K$82.87K$43.23K
$1.82M$1.71M$2.47M

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
33.15%29.83%18.82%17.33%
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
-12.75%19.60%-4.94%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and MUSQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023

0.62

The correlation between THNQ and MUSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THNQ
MUSQ

Technology

78.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
11.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
77.3%

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Industrials

1.3%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

THNQ
78.5%
MUSQ
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

THNQ
11.1%
MUSQ
11.5%

Communication Services

THNQ
4.3%
MUSQ
77.3%

Healthcare

THNQ
3.8%
MUSQ

-

Industrials

THNQ
1.3%
MUSQ
0.6%

Real Estate

THNQ
1.3%
MUSQ

-

Financial Services

THNQ
0.9%
MUSQ

-

Basic Materials

THNQ

-

MUSQ

-

Consumer Defensive

THNQ

-

MUSQ

-

Energy

THNQ

-

MUSQ

-

Utilities

THNQ

-

MUSQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. MUSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MUSQ
MUSQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MUSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THNQMUSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.91

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

-0.46

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

-0.94

+8.86

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the MUSQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and MUSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than MUSQ's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and MUSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQMUSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-23.11%

-27.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-23.11%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.88%

-23.11%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-18.60%

+9.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-7.07%

-7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

11.39%

-4.94%

Volatility

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) at 6.64%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THNQMUSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

6.64%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.75%

15.14%

+9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.08%

18.14%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.80%

18.08%

+11.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.97%

18.08%

+10.89%

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MUSQ's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

THNQ vs. MUSQ - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than MUSQ's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
0.72%0.63%1.08%0.74%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.15%0.20%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THNQ and MUSQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THNQ has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to MUSQ (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs MUSQ's -23.11%.

On 3-year performance, THNQ leads with 30.82% vs -0.43% for MUSQ. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, MUSQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 30.82% return vs -0.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for MUSQ.

MUSQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

THNQ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while MUSQ is Communications Equities. THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.76% for MUSQ.

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THNQ and MUSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer