THNQ vs. HTUS
THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. THNQ is passively managed, while HTUS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, THNQ returned 15.08%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for HTUS. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
THNQ vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 36.10% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 8.95% return.
THNQ
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 36.10%
- 6M
- 33.52%
- 1Y
- 66.41%
- 3Y*
- 35.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.08%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
THNQ vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 36.10% | 29.83% | 18.82% | 56.81% | -39.84% | 9.10% | 60.92% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.95% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 39.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between THNQ and HTUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between THNQ and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THNQ vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
THNQ
HTUS
THNQ vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THNQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.79 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 13.82 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THNQ vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than HTUS's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THNQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.56% | -47.50% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.39% | -8.68% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.88% | -24.41% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.56% | -24.41% | -26.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -2.67% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -4.05% | -10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 1.75% | +4.06% |
Volatility
THNQ vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 4.02%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THNQ | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.15% | 4.02% | +9.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.09% | 10.00% | +13.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 12.04% | +16.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 19.09% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 21.49% | +7.40% |
THNQ vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
THNQ vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than HTUS's 10.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.91% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.15% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THNQ and HTUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THNQ has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to HTUS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 15.08% vs 14.66% for HTUS. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 15.08% return vs 14.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.
THNQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.97% for HTUS.
THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THNQ and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer