THLV vs. RSPA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THLV is a Equal Weight fund tracking the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while RSPA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, THLV returned 14.95% vs 19.71% for RSPA. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RSPA.

Performance

THLV vs. RSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than RSPA's 11.50% return.

THLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -2.87%
• 6M: 2.97%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 1Y: 14.95%
• 3Y*: 9.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

RSPA

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 8.76%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 1Y: 19.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	$10.20M	$12.25M	$9.83M
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	$336.07K	$335.31K	$358.63K

THLV vs. RSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	8.51%	10.50%	0.55%
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	11.50%	11.07%	3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and RSPA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024	0.79

The correlation between THLV and RSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

THLV vs. RSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THLV	RSPA
Energy	17.5%	3.8%
Technology	17.5%	17.3%
Consumer Cyclical	15.5%	10.9%
Real Estate	14.0%	5.9%
Utilities	14.0%	6.3%
Financial Services	13.8%	13.9%
Industrials	13.8%	15.7%
Consumer Defensive	13.7%	6.3%
Healthcare	12.5%	12.0%
Basic Materials	11.3%	3.9%
Communication Services	0.1%	4.0%

Return for Risk

THLV vs. RSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 55
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

RSPA

RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 84
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THLV vs. RSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THLV	RSPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.94	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.77	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.98	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	12.14	-5.91

THLV vs. RSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the RSPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and RSPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

THLV vs. RSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum RSPA drawdown of -15.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and RSPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	THLV	RSPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-15.37%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-6.21%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-0.39%	-2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-1.92%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.52%	+0.72%

Volatility

THLV vs. RSPA - Volatility Comparison

THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) at 2.00%. This indicates that THLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THLV	RSPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	2.00%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.01%	6.74%	+1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	9.53%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.74%	12.68%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.74%	12.68%	-0.94%

THLV vs. RSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

THLV vs. RSPA - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than RSPA's 8.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	8.93%	9.14%	4.03%	0.00%	0.00%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.63%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THLV and RSPA in my portfolio?

THLV and RSPA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THLV or RSPA?

THLV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to RSPA (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs RSPA's -15.37%.

Which ETF is better, THLV or RSPA?

On 1-year performance, RSPA leads with 19.71% vs 14.95% for THLV. On fees, RSPA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RSPA has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THLV or RSPA?

Over the 1-year period, RSPA has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 14.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THLV or RSPA?

RSPA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THLV or RSPA?

RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 8.93%, compared with 1.63% for THLV.

What is the main difference between THLV and RSPA?

THLV is categorized as Equal Weight, while RSPA is S&P 500. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while RSPA tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: THOR and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.29% for RSPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.