RSPA vs. RSP
RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSPA returned 17.80% vs 18.97% for RSP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
RSPA vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.94% return.
RSPA
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
RSPA vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 8.25% | 11.07% | 3.51% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.94% | 11.21% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPA and RSP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between RSPA and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPA vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPA
RSP
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
RSPA
RSP
Technology
RSPA
RSP
Industrials
RSPA
RSP
Healthcare
RSPA
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
RSPA
RSP
Consumer Defensive
RSPA
RSP
Utilities
RSPA
RSP
Real Estate
RSPA
RSP
Basic Materials
RSPA
RSP
Energy
RSPA
RSP
Communication Services
RSPA
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPA vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
RSPA
RSP
RSPA vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPA | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.43 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 9.17 | +2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPA vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPA | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -59.92% | +44.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.21% | -7.85% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -1.49% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -6.64% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.07% | -0.51% |
Volatility
RSPA vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is 2.66%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that RSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPA | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 3.63% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 8.68% | -1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 11.82% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 16.20% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 18.33% | -5.40% |
RSPA vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPA vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, more than RSP's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.53% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 9.07% | 9.14% | 4.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, RSPA and RSP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RSP has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to RSPA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPA dropped -15.37% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 1-year performance, RSP leads with 18.97% vs 17.80% for RSPA. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSPA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSP has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 17.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RSPA.
RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 1.53% for RSP.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RSPA and 0.20% for RSP.
RSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPA and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer