THLV vs. LQAI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI).

THLV and LQAI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. THLV is a passively managed fund by THOR that tracks the performance of the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2022. LQAI is an actively managed fund by QRAFT. It was launched on Nov 7, 2023.

Performance

THLV vs. LQAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

THLV vs. LQAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	6.82%	10.50%	9.52%	8.43%
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	-1.92%	13.70%	27.82%	9.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than LQAI's -1.92% return.

THLV

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: 6.82%
• 6M: 8.18%
• 1Y: 20.10%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQAI

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: -1.92%
• 6M: -4.49%
• 1Y: 19.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THLV vs. LQAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than LQAI's 0.75% expense ratio.

LQAI

LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF

THLV

THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF

Return for Risk

THLV vs. LQAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

LQAI

LQAI Risk / Return Rank: 58
LQAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LQAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LQAI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LQAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
LQAI Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. LQAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THLV	LQAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	0.98	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.45	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	1.64	+1.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.39	5.29	+6.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THLV vs. LQAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the LQAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and LQAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THLV	LQAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	0.98	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.20	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and LQAI is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

THLV vs. LQAI - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than LQAI's 1.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.66%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%
LQAI LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	1.11%	1.14%	0.69%	0.16%	0.00%

Drawdowns

THLV vs. LQAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum LQAI drawdown of -21.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and LQAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	THLV	LQAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-21.24%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-12.21%	+5.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-7.38%	+3.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-3.19%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	3.79%	-1.95%

Volatility

THLV vs. LQAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 3.55%, while LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THLV	LQAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	6.08%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	12.25%	-4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	19.99%	-8.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.80%	17.01%	-5.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.80%	17.01%	-5.21%