PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THLV vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return.


THLV

1D
0.58%
1M
2.10%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.27%
1Y
19.42%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
79.04%
6M
69.31%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THLV vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
10.12%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.55%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.04%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%-7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and DBE is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022

0.07

The correlation between THLV and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THLVDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

5.67

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

11.08

-2.18

THLV vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THLVDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.33

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.09

+0.80

Drawdowns

THLV vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THLVDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-86.69%

+73.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-14.41%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-23.89%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-32.03%

+30.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-57.30%

+53.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

7.37%

-5.18%

Volatility

THLV vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 3.42%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THLVDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

13.05%

-9.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

30.97%

-23.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

35.07%

-25.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

29.41%

-17.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

28.34%

-16.61%

THLV vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

THLV vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than DBE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.61%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THLV and DBE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to THLV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 22.41% vs 12.88% for THLV. On fees, THLV is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 22.41% return vs 12.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THLV is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.61% for THLV.

THLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: THOR and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THLV and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer