PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THLV vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.


THLV

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.23%
6M
6.35%
YTD
11.24%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.53%
6M
26.18%
YTD
30.19%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THLV vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
11.24%10.50%9.52%5.88%1.22%
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
30.19%6.07%5.96%-6.56%-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and COMT is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022

0.12

The correlation between THLV and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THLVCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.90

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

6.35

+1.31

THLV vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THLV vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THLVCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-51.89%

+38.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-17.57%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-17.57%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-11.28%

+10.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-23.95%

+20.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

5.24%

-3.00%

Volatility

THLV vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 2.53%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THLVCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

5.91%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

19.67%

-11.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

21.54%

-11.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

21.20%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.75%

18.85%

-7.10%

THLV vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

THLV vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
5.95%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.59%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THLV and COMT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to THLV (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 12.71% vs 11.02% for THLV. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 1.59% for THLV.

THLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: THOR and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.48% for COMT.

THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THLV and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer