THLV vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THLV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, THLV returned 12.44%/yr vs 128.11%/yr for BWET. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

THLV vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,030.31% return.

THLV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 20.29%
• 3Y*: 12.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: 25.30%
• YTD: 1,030.31%
• 6M: 892.97%
• 1Y: 1,640.62%
• 3Y*: 128.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THLV vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	11.11%	10.50%	9.52%	8.28%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,030.31%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and BWET is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.01

Return for Risk

THLV vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 60
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THLV	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	16.89	-14.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	6.36	-3.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.92	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	54.19	-51.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	142.88	-133.77

THLV vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 16.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

THLV vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	THLV	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-56.90%	+43.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-30.64%	+23.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-56.81%	+43.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	0.00%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-23.78%	+20.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	11.60%	-9.37%

Volatility

THLV vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 3.86%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 25.51%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THLV	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	25.51%	-21.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.98%	88.96%	-80.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.27%	98.53%	-88.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	70.43%	-58.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.81%	70.43%	-58.62%

THLV vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

THLV vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.60%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THLV and BWET in my portfolio?

THLV and BWET have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THLV or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to THLV (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, THLV or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 128.11% vs 12.44% for THLV. On fees, THLV is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THLV or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 128.11% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THLV or BWET?

THLV is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THLV or BWET?

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between THLV and BWET?

THLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BWET is Commodities. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: THOR and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.