THLV vs. ABIG
THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and ABIG (Argent Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. THLV is passively managed, while ABIG is actively managed. Over the past year, THLV returned 19.42% vs 18.99% for ABIG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ABIG.
Performance
THLV vs. ABIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly higher than ABIG's 7.21% return.
THLV
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 19.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABIG
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THLV vs. ABIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 10.12% | 16.36% |
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF | 7.21% | 16.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between THLV and ABIG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between THLV and ABIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THLV vs. ABIG — Risk / Return Rank
THLV
ABIG
THLV vs. ABIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THLV | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 1.39 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 5.01 | +3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THLV | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.46 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.53 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
THLV vs. ABIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, roughly equal to the maximum ABIG drawdown of -13.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and ABIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THLV | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.15% | -13.70% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -13.70% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.65% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -2.23% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.80% | -1.61% |
Volatility
THLV vs. ABIG - Volatility Comparison
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THLV | ABIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.37% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 10.02% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.84% | 13.08% | -3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 14.31% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 14.31% | -2.58% |
THLV vs. ABIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than ABIG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
THLV vs. ABIG - Dividend Comparison
THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than ABIG's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THLV and ABIG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THLV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to ABIG (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs ABIG's -13.70%.
On 1-year performance, THLV leads with 19.42% vs 18.99% for ABIG. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, THLV has performed better with a 19.42% return vs 18.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.
THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.09% for ABIG.
They also come from different issuers: THOR and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.49% for ABIG.
THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THLV and ABIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer