ABIG vs. SAMT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ABIG (Argent Large Cap ETF) and SAMT (Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ABIG returned 16.16% vs 24.28% for SAMT. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ABIG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SAMT.

Performance

ABIG vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABIG achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than SAMT's 12.63% return.

ABIG

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 9.37%
• YTD: 9.74%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.46%

SAMT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -5.73%
• 6M: 8.34%
• YTD: 12.63%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	$101.44K	$93.59K	$126.72K
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	$5.05M	$5.51M	$7.81M

ABIG vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	9.74%	27.75%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	12.63%	43.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ABIG and SAMT is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025	0.63

The correlation between ABIG and SAMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ABIG vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABIG

ABIG Risk / Return Rank: 37
ABIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ABIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ABIG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ABIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ABIG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

SAMT

SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABIG vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABIG	SAMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.29	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.82	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.23	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	2.33	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.66	6.04	-2.37

ABIG vs. SAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the SAMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABIG and SAMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABIG vs. SAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABIG drawdown since its inception was -13.70%, smaller than the maximum SAMT drawdown of -20.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIG and SAMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABIG	SAMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.70%	-20.57%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.70%	-9.79%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.13%	+9.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-7.62%	+5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	3.78%	+0.08%

Volatility

ABIG vs. SAMT - Volatility Comparison

Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) at 3.43%. This indicates that ABIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABIG	SAMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	3.43%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.98%	14.23%	-3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.08%	17.72%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.11%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.11%	-0.48%

ABIG vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABIG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABIG vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison

ABIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SAMT's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	0.09%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	0.62%	0.70%	1.40%	1.49%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABIG and SAMT in my portfolio?

ABIG and SAMT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABIG or SAMT?

ABIG has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SAMT (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABIG dropped -13.70% vs SAMT's -20.57%.

Which ETF is better, ABIG or SAMT?

On 1-year performance, SAMT leads with 24.28% vs 16.16% for ABIG. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SAMT has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABIG or SAMT?

Over the 1-year period, SAMT has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABIG or SAMT?

ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABIG or SAMT?

SAMT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.09% for ABIG.

What is the main difference between ABIG and SAMT?

They also come from different issuers: Argent and Strategas. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ABIG and 0.66% for SAMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.