THD vs. ECNS
THD (iShares MSCI Thailand ETF) and ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - THD tracks the MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index while ECNS tracks the MSCI China Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, THD returned 3.47%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for ECNS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
THD vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THD achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than ECNS's -4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, THD has outperformed ECNS with an annualized return of 3.47%, while ECNS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.
THD
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 25.06%
- 1Y
- 42.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
ECNS
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -7.48%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- -6.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
THD vs. ECNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF | 24.17% | 2.36% | -2.21% | -12.63% | 1.22% | 1.87% | -9.89% | 8.32% | -8.25% | 31.45% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -4.50% | 36.49% | 5.64% | -23.05% | -24.58% | 2.11% | 25.42% | 7.84% | -18.27% | 27.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between THD and ECNS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.45 |
THD vs. ECNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THD
ECNS
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
THD
ECNS
Energy
THD
ECNS
Financial Services
THD
ECNS
Communication Services
THD
ECNS
Consumer Defensive
THD
ECNS
Utilities
THD
ECNS
Healthcare
THD
ECNS
Real Estate
THD
ECNS
Consumer Cyclical
THD
ECNS
Basic Materials
THD
ECNS
Technology
THD
ECNS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THD vs. ECNS — Risk / Return Rank
THD
ECNS
THD vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THD | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 0.76 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 1.51 | +7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THD | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 0.66 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | -0.24 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.07 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.02 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
THD vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THD drawdown since its inception was -64.22%, roughly equal to the maximum ECNS drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THD and ECNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THD | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.22% | -63.43% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -18.08% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.11% | -31.72% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | -59.61% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.32% | -63.43% | +14.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | -38.52% | +29.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -29.39% | +11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 9.14% | -4.56% |
Volatility
THD vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) at 5.64%. This indicates that THD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THD | ECNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.64% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 12.87% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 20.92% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 29.44% | -9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 25.90% | -4.32% |
THD vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both THD and ECNS have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
THD vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison
THD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than ECNS's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.49% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF | 2.71% | 3.36% | 3.15% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.42% | 2.57% | 2.16% | 2.61% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THD and ECNS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to ECNS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THD dropped -64.22% vs ECNS's -63.43%.
On 10-year performance, THD leads with 3.47% vs 1.88% for ECNS. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, THD has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THD and ECNS have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 2.71% for THD.
THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index, while ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index.
THD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THD and ECNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer