TGRW vs. SCHB
TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. TGRW is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGRW returned 7.54%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGRW charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
TGRW vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 8.88% return.
TGRW
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
TGRW vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.74% | 15.62% | 29.94% | 48.87% | -38.42% | 14.97% | 16.40% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 8.88% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 16.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRW and SCHB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TGRW and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
TGRW vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRW
SCHB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TGRW
SCHB
Communication Services
TGRW
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
TGRW
SCHB
Healthcare
TGRW
SCHB
Financial Services
TGRW
SCHB
Industrials
TGRW
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
TGRW
SCHB
Basic Materials
TGRW
SCHB
Real Estate
TGRW
SCHB
Energy
TGRW
-
SCHB
Utilities
TGRW
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRW vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
TGRW
SCHB
TGRW vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGRW | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.34 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.72 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | 12.04 | -9.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGRW vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRW | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.33% | -35.27% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | -8.91% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.18% | -19.34% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.33% | -25.41% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -2.86% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -4.11% | -8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 2.01% | +4.04% |
Volatility
TGRW vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 5.00%. This indicates that TGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRW | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.00% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 10.09% | +3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 12.83% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 17.35% | +6.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 18.34% | +4.70% |
TGRW vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRW vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGRW and SCHB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGRW has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to SCHB (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 11.98% vs 7.54% for TGRW. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.
TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRW and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer