TGRT vs. USO
TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. TGRT is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past year, TGRT returned 21.59% vs 101.55% for USO. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
TGRT vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
TGRT
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
TGRT vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 5.49% | 16.94% | 32.85% | 12.79% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRT and USO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TGRT and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRT vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
TGRT
USO
TGRT vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGRT | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 5.01 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 9.42 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGRT | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.31 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | -0.18 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
TGRT vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRT | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -98.19% | +76.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -20.39% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -85.01% | +83.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -75.30% | +72.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 10.82% | -5.38% |
Volatility
TGRT vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) is 3.66%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that TGRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRT | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 14.87% | -11.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 38.23% | -25.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 44.20% | -28.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 36.06% | -16.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 39.00% | -19.91% |
TGRT vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRT vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGRT and USO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to TGRT (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 1-year performance, USO leads with 101.55% vs 21.59% for TGRT. On fees, TGRT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 101.55% return vs 21.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGRT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
TGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
TGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRT and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer