TGRT vs. TMSL
TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and TMSL (T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TMSL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGRT returned 21.59% vs 31.37% for TMSL. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMSL.
Performance
TGRT vs. TMSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than TMSL's 16.49% return.
TGRT
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMSL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGRT vs. TMSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 5.49% | 16.94% | 32.85% | 12.79% |
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 16.49% | 11.95% | 15.81% | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRT and TMSL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TGRT and TMSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
TGRT vs. TMSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRT
TMSL
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGRT
TMSL
Communication Services
TGRT
TMSL
Consumer Cyclical
TGRT
TMSL
Healthcare
TGRT
TMSL
Financial Services
TGRT
TMSL
Industrials
TGRT
TMSL
Consumer Defensive
TGRT
TMSL
Utilities
TGRT
TMSL
Basic Materials
TGRT
TMSL
Energy
TGRT
TMSL
Real Estate
TGRT
-
TMSL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRT vs. TMSL — Risk / Return Rank
TGRT
TMSL
TGRT vs. TMSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGRT | TMSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.82 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 11.55 | -7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGRT | TMSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.83 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
TGRT vs. TMSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum TMSL drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and TMSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRT | TMSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -24.39% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -11.19% | -6.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -0.50% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -3.94% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 2.72% | +2.72% |
Volatility
TGRT vs. TMSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) is 3.66%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that TGRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRT | TMSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 5.40% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 13.66% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 17.27% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 18.39% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 18.39% | +0.70% |
TGRT vs. TMSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TMSL's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRT vs. TMSL - Dividend Comparison
TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TMSL's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGRT and TMSL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMSL has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to TGRT (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs TMSL's -24.39%.
On 1-year performance, TMSL leads with 31.37% vs 21.59% for TGRT. On fees, TGRT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMSL has performed better with a 31.37% return vs 21.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGRT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMSL.
TMSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.07% for TGRT.
TGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TMSL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.55% for TMSL.
TMSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRT and TMSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer