PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSL vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMSL vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMSL vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TMSL
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
2.14%11.95%15.81%11.22%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.93%12.66%11.38%7.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 0.93% return.


TMSL

1D
4.09%
1M
-6.41%
YTD
2.14%
6M
4.84%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWM

1D
3.50%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
0.93%
6M
3.02%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMSL vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMSL vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSL
TMSL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TMSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSL vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMSLIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

1.11

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.66

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.82

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

6.76

-0.85

TMSL vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSL and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSLIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.11

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.34

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between TMSL and IWM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TMSL vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than IWM's 1.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMSL
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.55%0.57%0.44%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.02%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Drawdowns

TMSL vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and IWM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSLIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-59.05%

+34.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.61%

-13.74%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-7.91%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-10.83%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.70%

-0.17%

Volatility

TMSL vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.47%. This indicates that TMSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMSLIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

7.47%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

14.47%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

23.18%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

22.55%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

22.99%

-4.62%