TGRT vs. TBUX
TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TGRT returned 21.20%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for TBUX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for TBUX.
Performance
TGRT vs. TBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than TBUX's 1.93% return.
TGRT
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBUX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGRT vs. TBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.43% | 16.94% | 32.85% | 13.15% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.93% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRT and TBUX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRT vs. TBUX — Risk / Return Rank
TGRT
TBUX
TGRT vs. TBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGRT | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 2.98 | -1.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 46.67 | -45.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 170.85 | -168.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGRT vs. TBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, which is greater than TBUX's maximum drawdown of -1.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and TBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRT | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -1.82% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -0.10% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.04% | -0.33% | -21.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | 0.00% | -6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -0.28% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 0.03% | +5.54% |
Volatility
TGRT vs. TBUX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) at 0.25%. This indicates that TGRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRT | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 0.25% | +6.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 0.48% | +13.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 0.68% | +16.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 1.06% | +18.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 1.06% | +18.17% |
TGRT vs. TBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than TBUX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRT vs. TBUX - Dividend Comparison
TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than TBUX's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% |
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.08% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGRT and TBUX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGRT has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to TBUX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs TBUX's -1.82%.
On 3-year performance, TGRT leads with 21.20% vs 5.86% for TBUX. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TGRT has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TGRT.
TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 0.08% for TGRT.
TGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TBUX is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.17% for TBUX.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.93 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRT and TBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer