PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBUX vs. NEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBUX vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBUX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than NEAR's 0.73% return.


TBUX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.00%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
10Y*

NEAR

1D
0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBUX vs. NEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
1.83%5.37%6.38%6.39%-0.13%-0.25%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.73%5.90%5.09%7.42%0.41%-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TBUX and NEAR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.45

The correlation between TBUX and NEAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBUX vs. NEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBUX
TBUX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBUX vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBUXNEARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.96

1.55

+1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

46.27

3.33

+42.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

169.36

15.13

+154.23

TBUX vs. NEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBUX Sharpe Ratio is 6.90, which is higher than the NEAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBUX and NEAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBUX vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBUX drawdown since its inception was -1.82%, smaller than the maximum NEAR drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBUX and NEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBUXNEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-9.61%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-1.13%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.33%

-1.16%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.14%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.16%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.25%

-0.22%

Volatility

TBUX vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) is 0.24%, while iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that TBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBUXNEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.49%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.48%

1.06%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67%

1.39%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.06%

1.35%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.06%

2.50%

-1.44%

TBUX vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBUX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBUX vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison

TBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, which matches NEAR's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.44%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%
TBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
4.48%4.67%5.39%4.66%2.58%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBUX and NEAR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAR has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to TBUX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBUX dropped -1.82% vs NEAR's -9.61%.

On 3-year performance, TBUX leads with 5.83% vs 5.52% for NEAR. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TBUX has performed better with a 5.83% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.

TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 4.44% for NEAR.

TBUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NEAR is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TBUX and 0.25% for NEAR.

TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.90 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBUX and NEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer