TGRT vs. LSGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGRT returned 21.59% vs 12.43% for LSGR. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for LSGR.

Performance

TGRT vs. LSGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than LSGR's -0.58% return.

TGRT

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 5.18%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSGR

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: -0.58%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRT vs. LSGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF	5.49%	16.94%	32.85%	13.63%
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	-0.58%	15.32%	38.52%	12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRT and LSGR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.93

The correlation between TGRT and LSGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

TGRT vs. LSGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TGRT	LSGR
Technology	54.2%	32.1%
Communication Services	14.0%	28.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	17.4%
Healthcare	8.0%	8.9%
Financial Services	5.3%	4.8%
Industrials	4.6%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	4.5%
Utilities	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	0.4%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TGRT vs. LSGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRT

TGRT Risk / Return Rank: 32
TGRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TGRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TGRT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TGRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TGRT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LSGR

LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 20
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRT vs. LSGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGRT	LSGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.76	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	1.13	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.14	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	0.69	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.98	2.20	+1.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGRT vs. LSGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the LSGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRT and LSGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGRT	LSGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	0.76	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	1.08	+0.14

Drawdowns

TGRT vs. LSGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, roughly equal to the maximum LSGR drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and LSGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGRT	LSGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-22.92%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.89%	-18.13%	+0.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-3.72%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-3.89%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	5.67%	-0.23%

Volatility

TGRT vs. LSGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) is 3.66%, while Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that TGRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGRT	LSGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	4.72%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	12.36%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	16.39%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	20.39%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	20.39%	-1.30%

TGRT vs. LSGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than LSGR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGRT vs. LSGR - Dividend Comparison

TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while LSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.05%	0.08%	0.03%
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.09%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGRT and LSGR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, TGRT and LSGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TGRT or LSGR?

LSGR has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to TGRT (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs LSGR's -22.92%.

Which ETF is better, TGRT or LSGR?

On 1-year performance, TGRT leads with 21.59% vs 12.43% for LSGR. On fees, TGRT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TGRT or LSGR?

Over the 1-year period, TGRT has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TGRT or LSGR?

TGRT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LSGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TGRT or LSGR?

TGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for LSGR.

What is the main difference between TGRT and LSGR?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.59% for LSGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.