TGLR vs. VFLO
TGLR (LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. TGLR is actively managed, while VFLO is passively managed. Over the past year, TGLR returned 23.40% vs 34.44% for VFLO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGLR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VFLO.
Performance
TGLR vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 20.99% return.
TGLR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFLO
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- YTD
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- 34.44%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGLR vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLR LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF | 11.75% | 23.30% | 18.71% | 4.88% |
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | 20.99% | 17.51% | 21.83% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLR and VFLO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between TGLR and VFLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TGLR vs. VFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGLR
VFLO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
TGLR
VFLO
Financial Services
TGLR
VFLO
Industrials
TGLR
VFLO
Consumer Cyclical
TGLR
VFLO
Healthcare
TGLR
VFLO
Energy
TGLR
VFLO
Consumer Defensive
TGLR
VFLO
Communication Services
TGLR
VFLO
Basic Materials
TGLR
VFLO
Utilities
TGLR
VFLO
Real Estate
TGLR
VFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLR vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank
TGLR
VFLO
TGLR vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLR | VFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 5.37 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 16.75 | -5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLR vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than VFLO's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and VFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLR | VFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -17.79% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -6.44% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.34% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -2.46% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.08% | 0.00% |
Volatility
TGLR vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) is 2.74%, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that TGLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLR | VFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 4.29% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 12.11% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 15.65% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 16.00% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 16.00% | -0.81% |
TGLR vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLR vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison
TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VFLO's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLR LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.65% |
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.20% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLR and VFLO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFLO has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to TGLR (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs VFLO's -17.79%.
On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 34.44% vs 23.40% for TGLR. On fees, VFLO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TGLR has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 34.44% return vs 23.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFLO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.
VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 1.01% for TGLR.
They also come from different issuers: LAFFER TENGLER and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.39% for VFLO.
VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGLR and VFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer