TGLR vs. DBE
TGLR (Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TGLR is a Dividend fund actively managed by Wedbush, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. TGLR is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past year, TGLR returned 25.36% vs 61.44% for DBE. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TGLR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
TGLR vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 71.26% return.
TGLR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 25.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.26%
DBE
- 1D
- -4.26%
- 1M
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 57.84%
- YTD
- 71.26%
- 1Y
- 61.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.27M | $1.08M | $1.67M | |
| $127.00K | $118.29K | $218.46K |
TGLR vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF | 13.03% | 23.30% | 18.71% | 4.88% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 71.26% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLR and DBE is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TGLR and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLR vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
TGLR
DBE
TGLR vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLR | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 2.50 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.79 | 7.82 | +3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLR vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLR | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -86.69% | +66.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -24.72% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -34.98% | +34.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -57.13% | +54.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 7.90% | -5.74% |
Volatility
TGLR vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is 3.67%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that TGLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLR | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 15.07% | -11.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 34.26% | -23.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 37.66% | -24.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 30.15% | -14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 28.60% | -13.43% |
TGLR vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLR vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than DBE's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.26% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF | 0.93% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLR and DBE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to TGLR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 61.44% vs 25.36% for TGLR. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TGLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 61.44% return vs 25.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.93% for TGLR.
TGLR is categorized as Dividend, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.78% for DBE.
TGLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGLR and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer