TGLB vs. TDVG
TGLB (T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGLB is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past year, TGLB returned 13.13% vs 17.50% for TDVG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGLB charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.
Performance
TGLB vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TGLB having a 8.78% return and TDVG slightly lower at 8.44%.
TGLB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDVG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
TGLB vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 8.78% | 3.99% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 8.44% | 8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLB and TDVG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.74 |
TGLB vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGLB
TDVG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGLB
TDVG
Financial Services
TGLB
TDVG
Communication Services
TGLB
TDVG
Industrials
TGLB
TDVG
Healthcare
TGLB
TDVG
Consumer Cyclical
TGLB
TDVG
Basic Materials
TGLB
TDVG
Utilities
TGLB
TDVG
Energy
TGLB
TDVG
Consumer Defensive
TGLB
TDVG
Real Estate
TGLB
-
TDVG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLB vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank
TGLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TDVG
TGLB vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLB | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLB vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and TDVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLB | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -19.20% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -7.24% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -0.45% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -3.72% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
TGLB vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLB | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 9.73% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 13.92% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 13.89% | +0.32% |
TGLB vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLB vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison
TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% |
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLB and TDVG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, TDVG leads with 17.50% vs 13.13% for TGLB. On fees, TGLB is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 17.50% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGLB is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.
TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.18% for TGLB.
TGLB is categorized as Global Equities, while TDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 0.50% for TDVG.
Find the right allocation for TGLB and TDVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer