PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGED.TO vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED.TO) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TGED.TO is traded in CAD, while EFAS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EFAS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGED.TO achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 14.39% return.


TGED.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
7.40%
YTD
18.74%
6M
16.61%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*

EFAS

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.18%
YTD
14.39%
6M
16.83%
1Y
30.34%
3Y*
25.92%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TGED.TO
TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF
18.74%10.63%38.60%23.33%-14.27%20.42%19.17%10.07%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
14.39%40.10%11.92%12.12%-1.44%11.73%-7.02%4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TGED.TO and EFAS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.43

The correlation between TGED.TO and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGED.TO
EFAS

Technology

29.5%
0.1%

Industrials

25.5%
9.9%

Financial Services

11.4%
30.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

6.4%
8.6%

Energy

5.1%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

3.7%
11.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
8.1%

Utilities

0.2%
14.4%

Technology

TGED.TO
29.5%
EFAS
0.1%

Industrials

TGED.TO
25.5%
EFAS
9.9%

Financial Services

TGED.TO
11.4%
EFAS
30.1%

Healthcare

TGED.TO
10.5%
EFAS
0.1%

Communication Services

TGED.TO
6.4%
EFAS
8.6%

Energy

TGED.TO
5.1%
EFAS
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TGED.TO
4.2%
EFAS
1.9%

Real Estate

TGED.TO
3.7%
EFAS
11.3%

Basic Materials

TGED.TO
2.2%
EFAS
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

TGED.TO
1.5%
EFAS
8.1%

Utilities

TGED.TO
0.2%
EFAS
14.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGED.TO vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGED.TO
TGED.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TGED.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED.TO) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGED.TOEFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.56

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

5.64

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

18.79

-8.40

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGED.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGED.TO and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGED.TOEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.11

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.66

+0.36

Drawdowns

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGED.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.19%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -37.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGED.TO and EFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGED.TOEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.19%

-37.65%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-5.41%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-12.21%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-22.37%

-0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.18%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-5.08%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

1.62%

+1.30%

Volatility

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.70%. This indicates that TGED.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGED.TOEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

2.70%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

7.77%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

9.84%

+6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

12.96%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.04%

+0.74%

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGED.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGED.TO vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

TGED.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
5.05%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
TGED.TO
TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF
3.31%3.79%3.01%3.97%4.70%3.44%3.63%2.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGED.TO and EFAS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for TGED.TO.

TGED.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: TD and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for TGED.TO and 0.56% for EFAS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGED.TO and EFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer