PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFSL vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TFSL vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFSL achieves a 37.07% return, which is significantly higher than AB's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TFSL has underperformed AB with an annualized return of 6.60%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.


TFSL

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.37%
6M
31.66%
YTD
37.07%
1Y
46.97%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
6.60%

AB

1D
0.51%
1M
2.50%
6M
1.54%
YTD
1.52%
1Y
-1.70%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFSL vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFSL
TFS Financial Corporation
37.07%15.95%-6.73%11.18%-12.98%7.13%-4.53%29.24%13.93%-18.48%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
1.52%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TFSL and AB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2007

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TFSL:

$4.95B

AB:

$4.13B

EPS

TFSL:

$0.33

AB:

$3.38

PE Ratio

TFSL:

53.34

AB:

11.04

PS Ratio

TFSL:

6.15

AB:

13.74

PB Ratio

TFSL:

2.57

AB:

2.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

TFSL:

$806.96M

AB:

$250.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TFSL:

$249.75M

AB:

$250.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

TFSL:

$100.48M

AB:

$252.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFSL vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFSL
TFSL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TFSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TFSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFSL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFSL vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFSLABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.01

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

-0.12

+4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

-0.23

+12.20

TFSL vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the AB Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFSL and AB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFSL vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFSL drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFSL and AB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFSLABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.52%

-87.65%

+42.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-14.68%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.68%

-20.49%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.63%

-45.76%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.95%

-58.08%

+15.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-8.73%

+7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-26.17%

+9.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

7.51%

-3.57%

Volatility

TFSL vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFSLABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

5.44%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.25%

18.17%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.66%

22.40%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.59%

28.14%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

32.33%

-7.82%

Dividends

TFSL vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

TFSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, less than AB's 9.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.13%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
TFSL
TFS Financial Corporation
6.40%8.45%9.00%7.69%7.84%6.30%6.35%5.28%5.21%3.95%2.36%1.81%

Financials

TFSL vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TFS Financial Corporation and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
195.47M
0
(TFSL) Total Revenue
(AB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TFSL and AB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFSL has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to AB (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFSL dropped -45.52% vs AB's -87.65%.

TFSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFSL and AB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer