TFSL vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TFSL or RF.
Correlation
The correlation between TFSL and RF is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TFSL vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TFSL:
0.37
RF:
1.41
TFSL:
0.78
RF:
2.15
TFSL:
1.09
RF:
1.27
TFSL:
0.27
RF:
1.64
TFSL:
1.55
RF:
5.41
TFSL:
6.09%
RF:
6.71%
TFSL:
25.51%
RF:
25.71%
TFSL:
-45.66%
RF:
-92.65%
TFSL:
-20.10%
RF:
-11.60%
Fundamentals
TFSL:
$3.79B
RF:
$22.29B
TFSL:
$0.29
RF:
$1.93
TFSL:
46.55
RF:
12.70
TFSL:
0.00
RF:
4.78
TFSL:
$761.92M
RF:
$6.37B
TFSL:
$650.96M
RF:
$6.96B
TFSL:
$83.68M
RF:
$1.88B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFSL achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TFSL has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 5.31%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
TFSL
6.85%
6.68%
7.12%
11.00%
-2.66%
5.31%
RF
2.30%
-2.39%
10.78%
37.39%
12.61%
13.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TFSL vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TFSL
RF
TFSL vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TFSL vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
TFSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, more than RF's 4.07% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFSL TFS Financial Corporation | 8.44% | 9.01% | 7.71% | 7.86% | 6.30% | 6.35% | 5.28% | 5.21% | 3.95% | 2.36% | 1.81% | 0.94% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.07% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
TFSL vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFSL drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFSL and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TFSL vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 5.51%. This indicates that TFSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TFSL vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TFS Financial Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities