TFSL vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Performance
TFSL vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TFSL vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFSL TFS Financial Corporation | 7.20% | 15.95% | -6.73% | 11.18% | -12.98% | 7.13% | -4.53% | 29.24% | 13.93% | -18.48% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | -2.69% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
Fundamentals
TFSL:
$3.98B
RF:
$22.99B
TFSL:
$0.32
RF:
$2.42
TFSL:
43.47
RF:
10.80
TFSL:
4.96
RF:
2.42
TFSL:
2.09
RF:
1.30
TFSL:
$796.46M
RF:
$9.61B
TFSL:
$242.64M
RF:
$7.17B
TFSL:
$104.06M
RF:
$2.81B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFSL achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TFSL has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 4.37%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.02% annualized return.
TFSL
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
RF
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFSL vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
TFSL
RF
TFSL vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFSL | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.85 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.28 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 1.47 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 3.71 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFSL | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.85 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.29 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.47 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.17 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TFSL and RF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TFSL vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
TFSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than RF's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFSL TFS Financial Corporation | 8.04% | 8.45% | 9.00% | 7.69% | 7.84% | 6.30% | 6.35% | 5.28% | 5.21% | 3.95% | 2.36% | 1.81% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.00% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
TFSL vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFSL drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFSL and RF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFSL | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.52% | -92.65% | +47.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -18.45% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.95% | -40.99% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.95% | -60.73% | +17.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -14.79% | +7.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.35% | -31.19% | +13.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 7.31% | -3.08% |
Volatility
TFSL vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) is 4.22%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that TFSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TFSL | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 6.68% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.92% | 18.83% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.08% | 29.81% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 31.63% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 36.02% | -11.55% |
Financials
TFSL vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TFS Financial Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TFSL vs. RF - Profitability Comparison
TFSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TFS Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 197.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
TFSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TFS Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 197.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.
TFSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TFS Financial Corporation reported a net income of 22.27M and revenue of 197.77M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.