TFPN vs. NMBL

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) and NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TFPN charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for NMBL.

Performance

TFPN vs. NMBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than NMBL's 3.23% return.

TFPN

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -6.78%
• 6M: 7.37%
• YTD: 15.77%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NMBL

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: -0.02%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPN vs. NMBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	15.77%	0.71%
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	3.23%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPN and NMBL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

TFPN vs. NMBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPN

TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 71
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 71

NMBL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPN vs. NMBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFPN	NMBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.97	—	—

Drawdowns

TFPN vs. NMBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, which is greater than NMBL's maximum drawdown of -8.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and NMBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFPN	NMBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.72%	-8.05%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-4.07%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-2.18%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFPN	NMBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.43%	13.22%	+2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	13.22%	-0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	13.22%	-0.17%

TFPN vs. NMBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NMBL's 1.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFPN vs. NMBL - Dividend Comparison

TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NMBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	0.90%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFPN and NMBL in my portfolio?

TFPN and NMBL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TFPN or NMBL?

On fees, TFPN is cheaper at 1.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFPN or NMBL?

TFPN is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFPN or NMBL?

NMBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.

What is the main difference between TFPN and NMBL?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and NovaTide. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 1.99% for NMBL.