TFPN vs. VIG
TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFPN is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Tidal, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. TFPN is actively managed, while VIG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TFPN returned 6.27%/yr vs 14.92%/yr for VIG. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TFPN charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
TFPN vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 9.71% return.
TFPN
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $429.91K | $568.98K | $358.90K | |
| $229.58M | $245.27M | $258.85M |
TFPN vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 16.44% | 3.61% | 2.67% | -1.83% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 9.71% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFPN and VIG is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFPN vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
TFPN
VIG
TFPN vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFPN | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.28 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 9.28 | -0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFPN vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFPN | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -46.81% | +30.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -7.91% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.72% | -14.95% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -1.06% | -7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -5.47% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.94% | +1.31% |
Volatility
TFPN vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.69%. This indicates that TFPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFPN | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 2.69% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 7.61% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 10.14% | +6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 14.20% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 16.02% | -2.67% |
TFPN vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFPN vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.50% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFPN and VIG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TFPN has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to VIG (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPN dropped -16.72% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 3-year performance, VIG leads with 14.92% vs 6.27% for TFPN. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VIG has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.
TFPN is categorized as Global Allocation, while VIG is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFPN and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer